📰Also in this edition:
• Gillian Oxley on Current Real Estate Psychology
• CMHC Debates 40-Year Mortgage Merits
• Mortgage Bytes
Anytime a regulator publicizes that it's concerned about "risks," it makes headlines faster than a political scandal.
Take the mortgage risks OSFI rattled off last week, for example. Predictably, every major media outlet from the Atlantic to Pacific parroted OSFI's doomy messaging like a broken record, no questions asked.
What a drag. Lack of balance is a recurring...
📰
Also in this edition:
• Gillian Oxley on Current Real Estate Psychology
• CMHC Debates 40-Year Mortgage Merits
• Mortgage Bytes
Anytime a regulator publicizes that it's concerned about "risks," it makes headlines faster than a political scandal.
Take the mortgage risks OSFI rattled off last week, for example. Predictably, every major media outlet from the Atlantic to Pacific parroted OSFI's doomy messaging like a broken record, no questions asked.
What a drag. Lack of balance is a recurring theme in regulatory communications. Canadians hear "risk, risk, risk" and get spoon-fed one side of the story with almost no context in sight.
Well, here's some context for Ottawa's narrative creators. And if they're honest with themselves and Canadians—they'll address it (in public).
You don't have access to this post on MortgageLogic.news at the moment, but if you upgrade your account you'll be able to see the whole thing, as well as all the other posts in the archive! Subscribing only takes a few seconds and will give you immediate access.
This post is for MLN Pro subscribers only
Subscribe now